Home >> Other Media >> Julia Roberts is almost cute enough for the media, but not quite

Julia Roberts is almost cute enough for the media, but not quite

by Jennifer Kesler on August 1, 2011

Remember that really creepy Lancome foundation ad where Julia Roberts’ face had been airbrushed until she looked ghostly and unlike herself? The UK has banned it (along with a similar ad featuring Christy Turlington wearing a Maybelline foundation). The government over there has this interesting idea that airbrushing the hell out of a photograph intended to show how well a foundation works constitutes a fraud – and that girls and women are suffering enough from the pressure to look a way that no human being ever could with just makeup.

It’s too bad the US doesn’t give a crap about either problem, but you’ve gotta admit that’s the brilliance of capitalism. For proof, we’ve got the strongest economy and a healthy middle class and… oh, right. Never mind.

A clause in Roberts’ contract prevents anyone from seeing the untouched photos for the Lancome ad (some sources presume this is about vanity, but I think there could be business reasons for it and prefer not to judge). Here’s Roberts today side by side with the Lancome image:

Untouched current pic of Roberts beside heavily airbrushed Lancome ad

Uh-huh. The untouched image strikes me as more attractive because it looks less bizarre. But it also actually makes me wonder what foundation she’s using, because her skin looks great. The second image erases a lot of what makes her Julia Roberts, and while it looks flawless in the same way that anime characters look flawless… well, that states the problem right there.

Lancome insists the airbrushed photo accurately represents what the foundation will do for you, but that’s patently absurd: she’s been made up by a professional, skillfully lit by another professional, and carefully photographed by another professional, but they need to airbrush all that to show us how good it’s really going to look on us? I don’t think so. We’ll be applying the damn stuff ourselves and then appearing in whatever grotesque wrinkle-seeking, melasma-illuminating, redness-enhancing, oil-spotlighting, ashy-looking, sun-damage-emphasizing lighting the world throws at us. (Note: it’s not just this photo – read the comment thread derail on this post as a review of a Lancome product turns into a discussion of the eerie promo picture).

The company behind both Lancome and Maybelline is L’Oreal, but they’re hardly the only company responsible for this sort of thing. In fact, I’ve spend the past couple of decades grappling with two very contradictory messages: that Julia Roberts is gorgeous and I should want to look like her, and that she is aesthetically inadequate for Hollywood. It started with Pretty Woman.

Pretty Woman poster featuring Julia Roberts' head on someone else's bodyThat is Julia Roberts’ head on the body of model Shelley Michelle. Now, it’s been said that the only reason this happened was that the poster was put together well after the film had wrapped and neither actor was available for posing (apparently the male body isn’t Richard Gere, either). Fair enough. Let’s accept that. But that was not the explanation of the day for this next poster, which featured the legs of Donna Scoggins, Roberts’ body double in the film, who is famous for her legs and cast as a leg model in commercials:

Pretty Woman poster featuring just Donna Scoggins' legs.Now, here’s a shot of Julia Roberts’ legs now, from last fall when she was promoting her 2010 movie Eat Pray Love:

Picture of Julia Roberts in a short skirt - her legs look great!For real, Media Goons? She was about 42 when this shot was taken, so it’s hard to imagine her legs look better now than they did twenty-one years ago. If those legs aren’t good enough (and for whom? the hetero boys we’re assured will “sleep with anything”?), then fuck dieting, fuck exercise, fuck cosmetics and fuck cosmetic surgery. I hereby call on all women to give up on all this shit and tell our critics: “Why should I? I still wouldn’t be good enough for you anyway.” With this regime in place – let’s call it the “Hathor Prescription” and I’ll go make some videos and launch a line of leisure wear for it – you should become considerably more relaxed about your appearance in approximately thirty days, and completely stop giving a fuck at around ninety days.

L’Oreal spent a lot of years telling me I was “worth it.” I never was sure what that meant. It felt like some kind of lip service to my self-esteem, but when they confront me with a spookily airbrushed photo of one of the most successful actresses of all time, I wonder if there has ever been a woman born that L’Oreal considers “worth it.”

I recently sampled the Lancome foundation myself so I could give you a better idea of what it can really do for you. Here’s a slighty retouched photo – honestly, I hardly did anything to it, just corrected some red eye and stuff – which I may use in the promo for the “Hathor Prescription”:

Stick figure with Donna Scoggin's legs attachedYes, those are my real eyelashes.

{ 40 comments… read them below or add one }

1
Sylvia Sybil (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 9:27 am

If those legs aren’t good enough (and for whom? the hetero boys we’re assured will “sleep with anything”?), then fuck dieting, fuck exercise, fuck cosmetics and fuck cosmetic surgery. I hereby call on all women to give up on all this shit and tell our critics: “Why should I? I still wouldn’t be good enough for you anyway.”

Heh, I already do that! Well, I exercise and eat whole foods because they make me feel good, but I also eat chocolate and fuck anyone who says I should sacrifice what makes me happy now on the off chance it will eventually lead to me being judged worthy of making other people happy.

I think it’s awesome Britain’s banned these ads. Fraud is an aspect of airbrushing I hadn’t really considered. Hopefully the USA will pick up on this eventually (even if we do it the way we do everything else: ten years later and pretend we invented it).

  (Quote)  (Reply)

2
M.C. (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 10:03 am

Well, at least it’s obvious that the photo is airbrushed – so Lancome is an arse, but not a hypocritical one… I got so angry when I heard, that the Dove Natural Beauty campaign used manipulated print advertisments (http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/brandnewday/archives/2008/05/surprise_doves.html)

  (Quote)  (Reply)

3
Jennifer Kesler (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 11:05 am

Sylvia Sybil,

I hadn’t thought of airbrushing in terms of foundation as a fraud, either, but since foundation is supposed to hide little flaws, it makes complete sense.

M.C.,

Especially since it was “natural beauty” and sort of faux inclusive but not really… I think we had some old posts about that campaign.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

4
sbg (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 11:36 am

I knew when I bought the Almay Smart Shade concealer that there wouldn’t be clear little bubbles on my skin that just magically turned into my skin color upon contact. I really did, I just had a coupon! But I did not know that not only would it not smartly shade to my precise skin tone, it also would also blend worse than any other concealer I’ve ever tried and I was left with dark make up dots all over my face, only I didn’t know it until I was outside in public because my bathroom mirror is apparently very forgiving.

Yeah. So. We all know make up does not work miracles, so going to the PhotoShop lengths companies go to all on the wing and a prayer that they’ll trick you into thinking their product gets you closer to that fake fakery is not only false advertising, it’s just daft. Show me what your product can actually do and I’ll try it, or I’m sticking to my usual make up decision making, which involves picking whatever’s on sale. At Walgreen’s.

Also, Jenn, you and I could be twins! Seriously, I look almost exactly like that, but my hair is stick straight and my lips are a wee bit thinner (that damned plumping lipstick doesn’t work like collagen injections!).

  (Quote)  (Reply)

5
I.A. Scott (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 12:32 pm

I love his line “it’s a self-regulating thing, where you’re absolutely lying”. Also judging by that video they’re going for a “slightly jaundiced” look.

Maybelline makeup TV ads here have all had “eyelashes computer enhanced” or “enhanced in post production” type messages along the bottom for a long while now.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

6
Dani (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 2:06 pm

“The second image erases a lot of what makes her Julia Roberts, and while it looks flawless in the same way that anime characters look flawless… well, that states the problem right there.”

That’s what I thought when I saw it. In fact, it reminds me of when I was first moving away from drawing anime and starting to draw more realistic faces. I didn’t have a real understanding yet of how the face and facial muscles actually work, plus, I’d been drawing anime for years, and so my faces had eyes that were too big, a generic-looking nose and mouth, and a minimal amount of other details. Just like this image; it reads as a face, but is completely unrealistic (and not half so interesting) as a real face. Yet, this is the “ideal” that is shoved down our throats daily.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

7
Jennifer Kesler (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 2:09 pm

sbg,

I tried the Almay Smart Shade Foundation, and my skin started burning until I washed it off. Hypoallergenic, my ass.

Awww, you should try the Lancome and take a picture like I did! :D

I’ve been ignoring makeup ads for a long time – false eyelashes in mascara ads and so on. I love YouTube reviews for makeup products – in many of them, they actually apply the product in front of you, and you can see for yourself what difference it’s making.

I.A. Scott: Maybelline makeup TV ads here have all had “eyelashes computer enhanced” or “enhanced in post production” type messages along the bottom for a long while now.

Where’s “here” for you? UK?

Mascara ads have used fake eyelashes for years, and I think that constitutes a fraud, too. Really, an ad for a product should have to actually use that product, and nothing else.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

8
sbg (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 2:40 pm

Oh I just did!


Photobucket

Isn’t it uncanny, folks? (No, I’m not flipping Jenn the bird, and no, my hair isn’t naturally that color. However, I can recommend anyone to a natural way to achieve it the way I do. Hehe.)

Disclaimer: I edited because I fail at figuring out which side my beauty mark, er, mole shows on in a photo.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

9
I.A. Scott (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 2:56 pm

Jennifer Kesler,

Oh, yes. Probably should have made it clear.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

10
Jennifer Kesler (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 3:02 pm

sbg,

*dies of laughter* We look so much alike, I think… is it possible? SBG, we are both so blandly perfect, I think we must finally have achieved Teh Gorgeous! I’ll email these pics to a casting agent immediately and let you know what they say!

I.A. Scott,

Nah, I was pretty sure you’d mentioned being in the UK before, and it made sense from context.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

11
sbg (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 3:17 pm

Jennifer Kesler,

It’s more than I could have ever hoped, to be blandly perfect. I predict we’ll both be stars, and it’s all because of our make up choices. Brilliant! Everyone can get there.

Er, or.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

12
Rainicorn (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 4:45 pm

Heeeee, and they say feminists don’t have a sense of humor!

  (Quote)  (Reply)

13
minuteye (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 6:02 pm

Jennifer Kesler:
sbg,

Mascara ads have used fake eyelashes for years, and I think that constitutes a fraud, too. Really, an ad for a product should have to actually use that product, and nothing else.

Maybe make-up ads are supposed to be like surrealist paintings: it’s not a woman in a purple hat, it’s how you FEEL when looking at a woman in a purple hat. In the same way, it’s not what your eyelashes will look like when you put our mascara on, it’s the way passers-by will FEEL about your eyelashes while you’re wearing our mascara.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

14
Dina Bow (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 6:50 pm

Almost all marketing is fake and enhanced. Just look at the food labels at the grocery store or at a McDonalds ad. Pretty much nothing looks like it really does.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

15
sbg (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 6:56 pm

Dina Bow,

I think the distinction here is that these products imply that women can reach this level of perfection and that they should try to by purchasing these things which will, in fact, not make them any more perfect than they already are. The same isn’t exactly true for the shellacked, inedible versions of food in print ads.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

16
JT (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 7:28 pm
17
sbg (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 7:52 pm

JT,

Look at you, all fancy and stuff. It’s like you went to Glamour Shots for your photo!

  (Quote)  (Reply)

18
JT (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 8:01 pm

sbg,

I know, I can’t help it. Sometimes, I feel sorry for all those poor, unfortunate souls who are not as stunning as I. That picture truly captures my je ne sais quoi

  (Quote)  (Reply)

19
Jennifer Kesler (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 9:33 pm

JT,

Woohoo! We should definitely form some sort of club for women who, like Julia Roberts, have been transformed from “fairly hot” to “ragin’ cutie!”! Why, without my Lancome, I look like this:

http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures/35000/Ugly-Worm-35120.jpg

  (Quote)  (Reply)

20
Jennifer Kesler (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 9:34 pm

minuteye,

I like that theory! I… have a depressing idea it’s not what they’re actually after, but I kind of wish it was.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

21
Spartakos (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 10:47 pm

Nothing really to add the conversation (anything I wanted to say has alread been said, and better), but I had to say that I laughed my ass off over this thread…especially Jen’s pic of what she looks like without her makeup.

Anyone who says feminists don’t have a sense of humor hasn’t met any. :)

  (Quote)  (Reply)

22
JT (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 11:10 pm

Jennifer Kesler,

LOLLOL oh my god, good thing I wasn’t drinking anything.

Ahem, well, I actually look like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64604907@N03/6000573075/

Terrible scandal you know. No one must know, because as a celebrity I am of course very vain. VERY.
(sorry, I can’t resist the urge to draw funny pictures!)

  (Quote)  (Reply)

23
Red (like) (flag)
August 1, 2011 at 11:57 pm

I posted a few comments over there. I basically told Lancome if they wanted this product to be a top-seller, they had to make sure the photos of the models they use look like real human beings and not alien plastic toys that would give little children nightmares.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

24
Ace (like) (flag)
August 2, 2011 at 5:29 am

I gave up on all that shit round about middle school. Just said “fuck it” and I still don’t buy or use cosmetics for the most part, because even at the age of 13 I figured out that it just wasn’t gonna happen.

I’d rather be “ugly” for real than some fake, trussed-up “pretty” anyhow. Guess I’m just stubborn that way.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

25
sbg (like) (flag)
August 2, 2011 at 8:23 am

Jennifer Kesler,

LOL, if we’re doing that…

View at your own risk

Everybody has bad days sometimes, mostly without Lancome on.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

26
Jennifer Kesler (like) (flag)
August 2, 2011 at 8:30 am

Feminists would all commit suicide without senses of humor, I think. Honestly, this site was getting waaaay too depressing and burning us all out, so we decided to start injecting more humor and creativity into it – even as we’re ranting relentlessly about stuff that deserves a rant – because otherwise you just can’t withstand it.

JT, Love it!

Red, I really do have to wonder if there’s anybody out there falling for ads like this.

Ace, like you, I knew by about 13 I was never going to to be conventionally gorgeous – I just don’t fit that mold, and until they develop cheap cosmetic surgery to lengthen legs, I never will. But I like makeup because applying it is my only artistic outlet, and I can achieve looks that say, “Take me seriously” or “I am gorgeous in my own way” (see Penelope Garcia on Criminal Minds) and so on.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

27
Jennifer Kesler (like) (flag)
August 2, 2011 at 8:31 am

sbg, oh my. One of those mornings, amirite? LOL!

  (Quote)  (Reply)

28
Azzy (like) (flag)
August 2, 2011 at 12:52 pm

If the company claims any woman can achieve that photoshopped look with their foundation, they should prove it. They can pick any woman they like, as conventionally gorgeous as they can find, but if they can’t make her face look like a plastic doll-face glued to her skull, they should refund all their customers who bought their makeup because of their false advertisement.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

29
Dani (like) (flag)
August 2, 2011 at 2:06 pm

“If those legs aren’t good enough (and for whom? the hetero boys we’re assured will “sleep with anything”?), then fuck dieting, fuck exercise, fuck cosmetics and fuck cosmetic surgery. I hereby call on all women to give up on all this shit and tell our critics: “Why should I? I still wouldn’t be good enough for you anyway.””

This crossed my mind as I was helping myself to an extra sloppy joe last night :P

Ace:
I gave up on all that shit round about middle school. Just said “fuck it” and I still don’t buy or use cosmetics for the most part, because even at the age of 13 I figured out that it just wasn’t gonna happen.

I’d rather be “ugly” for real than some fake, trussed-up “pretty” anyhow. Guess I’m just stubborn that way.

It took all of middle school and high school of trying (and failing) to tame my frizzy curls (that grow horizontally as well as vertically) and oily skin, and feeling ugly as a result, to realize this. Now, I only wear makeup when I feel like it and want to have fun with it, and not because I feel obligated to.

I really hate the way these ads make us feel like we have to look (like their definition of) *perfect!* all the time just to be at all valued or respected (of course, there’s the fact that people who see women as nothing more than painted-up dolls wouldn’t respect us anyway…).

  (Quote)  (Reply)

30
SunlessNick (like) (flag)
August 2, 2011 at 6:48 pm

Red,

Yeah. A great many of these photoshopptedly “beautiful” pictures are tumbling right into the uncanny valley.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

Leave a Comment

READ THIS FIRST: By submitting a comment, you agree you have read our Discussion Guidelines and understand we reserve the right to post only those comments we see fit to post. If you want to submit a link or inform us about something you feel needs editing in the article, please use the email form.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: