Home >> Discussion >> Links of Great Interest, 6/12/09

Links of Great Interest, 6/12/09

by Maria on June 12, 2009

Bored at work? Check out these links of great interest! ;)

The Split This Rock poetry festival has a post by Katherine Howell reflecting on the murder of Dr. Tiller.

The ladies at Smart Bitches/Trashy Books talk about the historical facts NOT included in romance fiction.

Cristin at Self.com continues to model sane, healthy eating habits. Michelle of Pretty Year reflects on the nuttery of weight and BMI — she’s posted the results of her guess her weight challenge, and shows that BMI is weird and arbitrary. Gabi at Young, Fat, and Fabulous reports on the FFFashion Week, which will feature full figure designer fashions.

Center of Gravitas offers advice for LGBT-identified graduate students looking for work in the present academic climate. Jenn at Reappropriate talks about the politics of queer, focusing on Margeret Cho’s recent interviews.

Jezebel criticizes Marvel’s stupid attempt to make superheroines into the cast of Sex in the City. Is it bad I’m a little intrigued? All I’m saying is that it might be an entertaining trainwreck.

Megan Jhu at New University is all WHAT THE HECK? over the way girls are getting discouraged from being tomboys. She thinks about that in terms of the fashions getting marketed to tweens.

TroubleInChina offers some astute analysis of the role disabled characters play in the media.

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

1
Jha (like) (flag)
June 12, 2009 at 3:09 pm

There’s the 2nd Asian Women Blog Carnival ^_^ I’m hosting the next one!

  (Quote)  (Reply)

2
Charles RB (like) (flag)
June 13, 2009 at 5:01 am

Well, I don’t think Marvel Divas is literally trying to turn the heroines into Sex & The City’s cast. It’s just the tagline from the pitch because hey, women watched that show so those some women might buy the comic if we can insinuate a link, right? …right?

Also, the link to little-known facts of medieval hygiene have put me off the concept of time travel. :(

  (Quote)  (Reply)

3
gategrrl (like) (flag)
June 13, 2009 at 9:57 am

That was a fascinating discussion of what life was like back in the 1300-1600′s, wasn’t it? Dental hygiene–didn’t exist as we know it. At all. Yech.

I have no idea what audience the comic book writers think they’re really going to get with this approach. I suppose all the covers are going to be variations of purple, pink and electric blue with Prima flowers in the background?

  (Quote)  (Reply)

4
Charles RB (like) (flag)
June 15, 2009 at 2:49 am

The second cover does have some purple on it fading to white, but is basically the four character’s heads smirking at YOU. http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/3/33806/804295-64_marvel_divas_2_super.jpg

I dunno if that’s going to appeal to the alleged target audience, but when it comes to that sort of cover, I certainly this: http://www.2000ad.org/covers/megazine/hires/230.jpg

  (Quote)  (Reply)

5
Fraser (like) (flag)
June 15, 2009 at 12:33 pm

Potentially the Divas could be good: Contrary to Jezebel, there’s a lot of fun to be had with super-heroes out of costume, hanging around (though it’s a lot more difficult to do that on a regular basis, I would think).
But I agree that with relatively few super-heroines in starring roles, it’s a shame not to give them action. And the description doesn’t sound encouraging, as if they’re going to fit them into some standardized girl-template.
But of course, the proof will be the finished product.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

6
The OTHER Maria (like) (flag)
June 15, 2009 at 6:38 pm

They totally could be good. But, what I think is flipping out Jez., and is annoying me, is that you don’t really hear about proposals to talk about the “every day” lives of superheroes. For Bats, Supes, and the Green Arrow, their superhero life IS their real life. To me, that suggests that female superheroes are viewed as GIRLS first and superheroes second.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

7
Fraser (like) (flag)
June 16, 2009 at 6:48 am

Other Maria: Good point.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

8
Patrick J McGraw (like) (flag)
June 16, 2009 at 7:24 pm

While one could argue that this applies to many of DC’s characters, this is fundamentally NOT the case at Marvel. One of Marvel’s distinguishing features since the Silver Age has been their focus on the characters’ personal lives.

That said, given Marvel’s track record under Editor-in-Chief Joe Quesada, my expectations for Marvel Divas are so low as to be nonexistent.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

9
Mana G (like) (flag)
June 19, 2009 at 12:29 pm

Anybody else notice some of the adjectives used to describe Marvel Divas in that interview? “Sudsy,” “naughty,” and “hot” caught my particular attention. Sounds like they’re all going to be taking bubble baths together. Even though it’s also said the comic’s “really” about “what it truly means to be a woman in such a testosterone and guns-filled world,” (I’m paraphrasing), those descriptors still make me think it’s going to mostly be, “Sexy ladies! Being sexy! Yay for the male gaze!”

  (Quote)  (Reply)

10
Charles RB (like) (flag)
June 25, 2009 at 11:38 am

Marvel Divas has a 7 page preview online: http://www.newsarama.com/php/multimedia/album.php?aid=29023

It’s VERY VERY BORING.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

Leave a Comment

READ THIS FIRST: By submitting a comment, you agree you have read our Discussion Guidelines and understand we reserve the right to post only those comments we see fit to post. If you want to submit a link or inform us about something you feel needs editing in the article, please use the email form.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Previous post:

Next post: