Home >> Discussion >> Nepalese girls, indentured servitude, and what you can do to help

Nepalese girls, indentured servitude, and what you can do to help

by Jennifer Kesler on December 29, 2010

The L.A. Times reported yesterday that families in Nepal – ethnically Tharu – are so impoverished that they sell their daughters into indentured servitude, a year at a time. At its best, this practice means these girls miss out on education. They help their masters’ children get ready for schools they themselves will never attend.

In many cases, however, it means the girls are underfed, malnourished, and overworked. In yet other cases, they are outright abused sexually, physically and emotionally.

“The landlord’s son beat me many times,” said Bishnu Kumari, 17, who was rescued a few years ago. “I felt dirty, unlucky to be born a girl. I was a slave.”

Why the boys aren’t sold this way, I can only speculate: boys are important.

But there’s good news:

Charity groups have rescued thousands of girls in the last year, generally during the brief period when the annual agreements are renewed, by convincing parents that the practice is unjust, a daughter’s education is worthwhile and that there are far less exploitative ways to earn family income.

They’re also staging street dramas to raise awareness, and get the general public thinking this shit is wrong.

I was disappointed that the L.A. Times didn’t include a link to any of the charitable groups, but I found this one: the Nepal Youth Foundation. I’m very cautious about recommending charities, since, er, some of them don’t use your monetary donations the way you would hope. But the NYF lists several ways you can help that don’t involve giving them money, and provides handy links to make it easy for you (it’s all about raising awareness). So I’m very comfortable recommending that you take a look at their suggestions.

What’s happening to the Tharu is a particularly extreme example, but the perception that boys are worth more than girls is a problem anywhere there’s a patriarchy. Of course, it would be awesome if no family ever had to think of any of their kids in terms of ROI. But then, some super-wealthy person would have to settle for just being plenty-wealthy, and we can’t have that.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1
SunlessNick (like) (flag)
December 29, 2010 at 7:33 pm

“Thankyou for posting this” never seems quite the right thing to say, but hopefully you know what I mean.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

2
The Other Anne (like) (flag)
December 29, 2010 at 10:43 pm

Ditto.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

3
Attackfish (like) (flag)
December 29, 2010 at 11:02 pm

same

  (Quote)  (Reply)

4
Casey (like) (flag)
December 30, 2010 at 12:24 am

This

And I bookmarked the page, also.

  (Quote)  (Reply)

Leave a Comment

READ THIS FIRST: By submitting a comment, you agree you have read our Discussion Guidelines and understand we reserve the right to post only those comments we see fit to post. If you want to submit a link or inform us about something you feel needs editing in the article, please use the email form.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Previous post:

Next post: