I’ve created this thread to collect what I call “quick hits” – short phrases and examples that put across just why a bigoted argument is wrong. It’s often hard to think of these things when you’re struggling to comprehend that yes, someone really did just say that incredibly bigoted or ignorant thing, so let’s put lots of them in this comment thread and maybe it will help us out in the future.
You can include clever remarks, scenes from fiction or absolutely anything that you believe might help in an argument.
Please keep one thing in mind, though. Some people just are not open-minded at all. Arguing with them is a waste of your time, and when I get the urge to argue with someone like that, I remind myself my energy is better spent on people who ARE willing to learn – and I go write a post here, usually. So don’t expect these “quick hits” to suddenly convert all the bigots in your life. They may make you feel better, or they may convince a more neutral third party that the bigot is wrong. Those are both good things, but the actual conversion of a hardcore bigot is not something you can do. It’s simply out of your control.
Let the quick hits begin!


{ 43 comments… read them below or add one }
Next Comments →
As I mentioned recently, when crossing an “Adoption, not Abortion!” picket line to get to my annual pap smear, I asked the demonstrators if any of them had adopted any kids. The silence was deafening, so I sneered and called them assholes.
In conversations, I tell people: “We already have tons of kids no one wants to adopt. Are you going to adopt them? I didn’t think so.” It usually stops that topic in its tracks.
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
There’s a brilliant scene from “Scrubs” in which Elliot and Turk are debating who has it worse in the medical profession: women or black men? A black female doctor walks past, and they both acknowledge her. Then, completely missing the point, they go right back to their debate. This is such an awesome example of:
–Defaulting to whiteness (“women” means “white women”)
–How the debate over whether “[white] women” or “black men” have it tougher is a great example of privilege among the oppressed. A black man’s male privilege may well be trumped by his race oppression, and my white privilege may (at least sometimes) be trumped by my femaleness, but we both have privilege in comparison to a black woman.
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
Once upon a time, an old man was lecturing a clerk on how “the Jews, the n—-s and [I forget who else - probably feminists or women]” were conspiring to topple the white man from his “God-given” position as ruler of the world (never said that in my Bible, hmm). I told him, “Those groups combined outnumber you by far. If they ever all conspired against you, you wouldn’t have time to be standing here telling us about it.” To my surprise, he actually mumbled that he supposed that was true and STFU. As I said in the article, I’m sure it didn’t convert him, but it silenced him, and they sure see silencing US as a win, so there you go.
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
I have one!
I went to class wearing pretty butterfly earrings, but nothing else unusual, just my normal tee shirt and jeans. A male classmate (who sexually harassed me for most of the quarter) “complimented” me by saying, “You look like a girl today!” I pretended not to understand, frowned at him, and said, “I look like a girl* every day.” Which confused the hell out of him, so I elaborated, “I am a girl. This is what a girl looks like. All the time.” Then he clarified that he meant he liked my earrings, so I said, “Thanks! I like them too!”
It was funny as hell watching his face as he tried to figure out where the conversation got away from him.
* I decided not to touch on the infantalization – I’m actually a woman, dammit.
Sylvia Sybil(Quote) (Reply)
In the middle of yet another racist kerfuffle on YouTube, one commenter said that “prejudice is a natural human instinct!” I retorted that it’s also a natural human instinct to shit on the ground, but if you do it in the middle of someone’s living room, they have the right to be pissed.
Azzy(Quote) (Reply)
Right now, I don’t find the article but some of you probably know it: one strategy a woman used was to repeatedly ask the offending person what they said because she “didn’t understand” (you should look like that was true). If the person still is not ashamed enough and shuts up after repeating it several times you can end with “Sorry, I don’t understand, can you explain to me what you mean/why this is funny?”
I haven’t used it yet, but I think it is great if you are flabbergasted because someone directly attacked you and you can’t think of anything else.
Zweisatz(Quote) (Reply)
Got it!. (Sorry for double post.)
Zweisatz(Quote) (Reply)
Sylvia Sybil,
Ugh, I get that comment ALL the time. I usually have a similar response to yours, but I’m usually in too much of a tail spin to make them realize my “confusion” is because they said something ridiculous.
Worst yet is the comment “But, you’re not a real girl” as if it’s a statement I’m meant to agree with to prove their point. Could you imagine a man saying that to another man?
Jessie(Quote) (Reply)
Jessie,
“Could you imagine a man saying that to another man?”
Sadly, I and many others have experienced this far too often. My nickname in school was woman, sometimes girl, and I was frequently told that I was not a “real man” — this in itself a double-barrel example of prejudice: not only against those outside the rigid expectation of what a man is or can be, but also a subconscious expression of their sexist upbringing, e.g: I wasn’t good enough to be a man, therefore I must be a woman, somehow less.
I never had a good retort for them because my mind always went blank.
Fairfield(Quote) (Reply)
Fairfield,
I should have been more clear, as I meant: “Can you imagine a man saying that to another man *and not expecting it to be taken as an insult*?”
Which falls nicely in line exactly with your point: men/masculinity perceived as good/a compliment, women/femininity perceived as lacking/an insult. I totally agree.
Jessie(Quote) (Reply)
Zweisatz,
Thank you. I, like many others, am so flabbergasted by casually offensive statements that I don’t know how to respond. That response is simple, polite and universally applicable. Genius!
Clay Mechanic(Quote) (Reply)
LOL, I very often don’t understand bigoted remarks because they tend to develop regional shorthands which people who’ve lived in one place all their lives assume are universal. So, as someone who moved around a lot through childhood, I would make them repeat it, possibly spell it, explain the significance (which was often as obscure as Cockney rhyming slang), and then make them explain the stereotype behind the slur. At which point I of course end up observing that I’ve rarely or never (or no more often than with anyone else) noticed a member of the slurred demographic performing that particular stereotype, and ask for examples where the person sees this activity happening and so on. It was pure ignorance on my part, but it does point to a really good way to deal with this stuff.
Additionally, I once attended a communications in the workplace seminar, and they actually advise this if someone says something rude or nasty. “I’m sorry, could you repeat that?” They usually “never mind” it, but if they do repeat it, then you ask what they mean or “Are you saying X?” to get them to publicly own what they’ve just said. As with family, they will sometimes stick to their guns and you still have to be at least superficially on good terms with them (some corps will fire the anti-racist who “can’t get along with” the racist employees), but at least you’re not just nodding and chuckling uncomfortably like half the rest of the staff does just to “get along.”
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
Clay Mechanic,
Yeah, it was after exactly such a situation that I remembered the advise (someone higher up seriously agreed we could get stuff out of its box so that “I would not ruin my nails”. I was too flabbergasted to give an immediate reply apart from “That’s not the problem.”)
Zweisatz(Quote) (Reply)
One time a guy in my Women’s Studies class brought up the false-accusation argument while we were talking about rape (“all a woman has to do to ruin a man’s life is falsely accuse him blah blah blah,” you know). So I asked him for statistics on false accusations of rape, which (surprise) he didn’t have and I did.
If I’m arguing about someone on a subject that I clearly know more about than they do, pulling out some evidence is a good way to make them shut up, even if it doesn’t change their minds. And even if they keep arguing, they pretty much lose their credibility.
This isn’t a good way to win arguments on the internet, but in person it can be effective – or a good way to find out if the other person is just a jackass who doesn’t care that what they’re saying isn’t true.
Suicidewinder(Quote) (Reply)
Suicidewinder,
That’s a good point – that it can fail on the internet, but work better in person. I hadn’t thought of that, but in person, people can perceive how quickly you’re able to answer, and how confident you seem/sound. The ‘net loses those cues, and it can make arguments more befuddling.
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
Jennifer Kesler,
Although sometimes it doesn’t work that well if you can’t look up statistics because you don’t have Internet and the only way to “prove” to someone that women are seen as sex objects while men usually aren’t is yelling “Fucking open your eyes!” (which I finally decided against).
Really on the topic: another post written by Snarky’s Machine about badassery. She presents a really straightforward plan to deal with shit and the comments are always worth reading.
She basically says: decide what you want to fight, don’t let other people make you backtrack, plan your reactions, rehearse your reactions, react as often as necessary, always the same way.
Zweisatz(Quote) (Reply)
Ugh, I remember that feeling…in my first sociology class I said, straight up that white, cis, hetero, USian men of means rule the world and that we haven’t reached true equality yet, citing the fact that there hasn’t been a woman president and there’s hardly any women in the senate/congress. All the guys dog-piled on me demanding HARD STATISTICS despite the fact that, y’know, I DON’T CARRY THIS SHIT AROUND WITH ME 24/7 and I don’t have a laptop. It was infuriating (I wound up crying, shamefully enough).
Casey(Quote) (Reply)
If you CAN memorize statistics, it helps a lot. But also remember to turn the stats question back on them when you know they can’t possibly have stats against you. I.E., if they ask for stats on how many women are in Congress, “I don’t have it with me, but I know it’s well below 50%. Do you have stats that prove otherwise?” And I would’ve made excellent use of the president part: “I’m sorry, you need STATS to prove there’s never been a female president? Okay. 0% of presidents were women. Seriously?” Shows they’re just being jackasses.
But don’t try this tack when there are bogus stats that contradict you, i.e., the false accusation thing. There are bullshit stats that count every non-conviction as a “false accusation”, so that’s a whole different conversation.
But for your reference: the FBI thinks false rape accusations are about 2%. Same as other felonies, and I’d credit them with a more unbiased sense of it (outside DC, anyway) than local law enforcement with local ties.
And 17% of Congress was female a couple of years ago. If it’s changed some, it won’t be by much. That’s nowhere near 50%, which is all that matters.
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
Another thing I do sometimes, primarily when someone is trying to argue that such-and-such thing “doesn’t happen” or that no one from [specific group of people] does [certain thing], etc. is to refute arguments with personal experience. This is also not something I do on the internet, because most people on the internet seem ready to accuse each other of lying about anything in the world. It can also be risky and carry unforseen and potentially dangerous consequences, and is definitely not something I feel comfortable doing all or even most of the time, or something I think people should do if they don’t want to.
That said, if something is saying something like “sex workers can’t be raped” or “bisexual people are incapable of being monogamous” and if I feel comfortable disclosing to that person at that very moment that I have been a sex worker and have also been raped, or that I’m a bisexual person who has been in the same relationship for two years, then I do it. Those two examples did happen, and in both cases the conversation was shut down immediately, which was what I wanted.
I’d say it works best when one is facing a blanket generalization made by someone who doesn’t realize that a) the people they’re talking about actually exist in the world and b) the people they’re talking about might be/are people they know and/or respect.
Suicidewinder(Quote) (Reply)
Casey,
You’ll never guess what the person I talked to studied.
Jennifer Kesler,
Thanks for the figures. And it’s a good idea to ask them to prove me wrong if they like statistics so much.
Maybe I could’ve argued that most of the victims of sexual violence are women.
But I also encountered the “What, they say x percent were false accusations? Wonder how they got the number because technically …. blabla.” *arg*
But that’s why I usually don’t argue with people who have totally different opinions. I like to spend my time more sensibly.
That brings me to another tip: “Could we change the subject?”, repeated as often as necessary. You do not have to engage.
Zweisatz(Quote) (Reply)
Erm…statistics?
In my experience, when the topic of women overwhelmingly being the victims of rape, everybody prefaces their statements with “DON’T FORGET THAT MEN ARE RAPED TOOO!” and instead of it being an acknowledgement that anyone can be a victim, it always comes off like a “WHAT ABOUT TEH MENZ!?” argument or re-centers the argument to “MEN GET RAPED AND ABUSED BY WOMEN SO WHY SHOULD WE CARE ABOUT WOMEN GETTING RAPED AND ABUSED?!”
Casey(Quote) (Reply)
Casey,
no, sociology…
This. Always.
The thing about statistics is: if a person asks you to prove your point with statistics because they do not want to believe your lived experienced or what you’ve read etc., sometimes they also dismiss the statistics you offer. Or they will derail the way you just described.
Zweisatz(Quote) (Reply)
Jennifer Kesler,
Here’s another good stat. The constitutions of Iraq and Afghanistan both require 30% representation of women. That really puts the 17% into some nice context, no?
Annie D(Quote) (Reply)
Oh boy, I had a brain-fart. >_>V
Casey(Quote) (Reply)
Sorry for the double-post but THAT DOES REMIND ME of a guy I know on a forum who’s majoring in…some kinda journalism thing where he’s specializing in the effects of portrayals of race in the media who WhiteManS’plained to a WOC poster what is and isn’t racist. BOOO!
Casey(Quote) (Reply)
Casey,
I have, no joke, met a man who argues that men and women are raped in equal numbers but that men just don’t report it nearly as much. I was so flabbergasted that I couldn’t even think of anything to say.
Towanda(Quote) (Reply)
Towanda,
I could understand the number of male rape survivors being criminally low due to under-reporting but that’s just…some MRA-style buuuuuullshit. Bleh.
Casey(Quote) (Reply)
Towanda,
Oh, please. From our rape statistics page: http://thehathorlegacy.com/rape-statistics/
I don’t think 10% of men is an insignificant number. It’s lower than the 25% estimate for women, sure, but it equates to a huge number of men.
And I bet you nowhere near 10% of all men have *reported* being raped in their lifetime, at least not to the police or any sort of officials. Researchers are totally aware that all rape is under-reported, and they’ve obviously trying to arrive at guesstimates through other methods.
Side note: in my experience with men making arguments similar to this one, many are just misogynists bent on proving that women’s issues are crap and the status quo is best for everyone. But a few seem to genuinely believe rapes of men are being ignored, and just telling them, “Yes, we realize 10% of men are raped” seems to break down a barrier. I suspect this latter group may be victims of unreported rapes themselves, who feel deeply isolated.
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
Jennifer Kesler,
The statistic you quoted doesn’t say 10% of men have been raped, it says 10% of people who have been raped are men. Big difference.
Sylvia Sybil(Quote) (Reply)
Sylvia Sybil,
Oh, my bad – I’ve been stressed and trying to do many things at once lately. Here’s a better one – it’s more like 3%:
http://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/sexual-assault-victims
And I concur with the suggestion that 3% is low, because some sources rate the number of boys who’ve been molested higher than that (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse#United_States_and_Europe), which I find totally plausible:
http://www.aest.org.uk/survivors/male/myths_about_male_rape.htm
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
Next Comments →