Lauredhel of Hoyden About Town has posted the image of a t-shirt on her Dreamwidth. This t-shirt is available for sale, and some of the profits will be donated to Wikileaks, which of course really, really needs the money (in some other dimension). The shirt says quite simply:
Free Assange
Lock up your daughters
Lauredhel details why the slogan is not subversive humor. She also explains how “Lock up your daughters” is “not a warning between women, it’s an oh-so-hilarious homosocial catchcry between men “on the prowl”.” Read her article for more details on why those excuses/explanations won’t wash in this case.
Additionally, “Lock up your daughters” is an inherently problematic phrase because:
- It implies a daughter’s sexuality is her father’s commodity to trade, as indeed it was throughout human history until just a few decades ago (and still is in many cultures). (This is why, quite frankly, men raping their daughters isn’t as rare as you’d like to believe.)
- It implies that male sexuality mustn’t be locked up, because it’s so very, very important, you see, so women/girls and their guardians must hide themselves away if they don’t want to take part in male sexual rampages.
- It suggests that men on the prowl must not be expected to exercise rational judgment, since that might get in the way of their sexual rampaging, therefore any woman not wanting to service them sexually should be kept well out of their way. This frees them up to assume any woman they encounter is theirs for the taking. Anyone who later claims she didn’t see it that way will be interrogated and humiliated on the subject of why she didn’t lock herself in a convent if she didn’t really want to service the men.
But combine this phrase with a call to free a charged rapist, and it sinks to a whole new level. Even when male “sexuality” is actually just a violent form of brutality that happens to resemble sex superficially, that important force must not be locked up. It must be allowed to roam free at any costs, so if you don’t want your daughters to be part of it, lock them up.
There are days when it seems to me our entire civilization was built for no reason other than to ensure that men feel entitled to unlimited indiscriminate sex with women, and that women not even feel entitled to the occasional orgasm from a long-time partner. Women are lectured to prevent their own potential rapes, and prevent their own pregnancies, and prevent their own stalkings and incidents of sexual harassment. We’re advised to take responsibility and manufacture our own orgasms instead of waiting for male partners to give a shit. We’re held entirely responsible for things that are so out of our control, it’s a bit like holding someone responsible for things that happened before he was born.
Meanwhile, men are taught such senseless levels of entitlement that it never even occurs to many man that the unwanted but natural consequences of sex were something he could’ve avoided by simply not having it or employing some precautions. No, if there’s an unwanted pregnancy, he has been mistreated! If there’s an abortion he doesn’t approve of, he has been mistreated! There was nothing he could do to prevent it! He couldn’t just be celibate, could he? Couldn’t bring a condom with him? Couldn’t avoid dating a woman he knew was after his money or wanted to hurt him in some way? Couldn’t get a vasectomy?
Oh, and let’s not forget the most tragic thing in the world: men who can’t get sex. Poor dears. All the rapes in the Congo pale next to the travesty that is not getting any if you’re a male, thirteen or older. He can’t possibly be expected to work on his looks or his charm. He just sits around whining about how he’s so nice and women don’t like nice guys. (Meanwhile, women who aren’t getting sex or dates are taught to question themselves and what they are doing wrong, until they are blue in the face. If they can’t find anything, they’re to assume it’s weight and go on a starvation diet. Yes, this applies even if they’re already 20 pounds underweight.)
No, men mustn’t pause to examine themselves, their motives or the likely consequences of their actions, ever, for if they do, it might distract them or even dissuade them from the quest society has handed them: the mindless screwing of everything in sight. Everything in the world, including the welfare of children (and even male happiness), must be sacrificed and is sacrificed daily to preserve the male entitlement (and requirement) to fuck the whole world. Hell, they don’t even limit themselves to human beings. They fuck animals, too. And metaphorically, they fuck the world over, because it would be so unhip to consider the well-being of some silly rain forest for five minutes when there’s fucking to be done!
And by “fucking”, what we really mean is consumption. The using, ruining and casting aside of everyone and everything. It’s just the manly thing to do!
Julian Assange’s entitlement to fuck everyone he’s ever met is more important than the rights of any woman in the world to decide who she will and will not have sex with. Also more important is his right to decide how to fuck them – say, without a condom. That’s what this t-shirt is saying.
That’s what rape culture has always been saying: neither a woman’s right to decide who she’ll have sex with nor her right not to be physically brutalized is as important as keeping the menz up to their chins in sexual access to everyone and everything. When this policy brings the human species to an end, I just hope it doesn’t take the rest of the planet with it.


{ 63 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
Next Comments →
But in both cases it’s the women’s fault, of course.
Sylvia Sybil(Quote) (Reply)
I think you might be on to something there, if only from the phrasing of it. Lock up is not usually used to mean “protect” but to mean “control/limit freedom”. If I lock the chickens up it’s to corral them in; if I lock them in it’s to lock the fox out.
Sylvia Sybil(Quote) (Reply)
Great point – I agree with your definition of need, and yeah, sex is more likely to damage you than to somehow save your life. Also: childbirthing deaths.
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
This. Whatever women are thought of at any given time in any given culture, it must be the inferior, unhealthy, strange pole of the two.
Attackfish(Quote) (Reply)
It is accurate, which is part of what makes our gender narratives so confusing. Some of them are “lustless, love craving” which we get from the Victorians, where as others are “uncontrollable, lust filled” narratives that we get from before them. For example, both are used to justify rape: if women don’t want sex, then men have to fight for it, and overcome their objections, whether by trickery, persuasion, pressure, or force. If women want sex constantly, they can’t be raped, because they’re always secretly willing (also used to dismiss male rape victims, of course). This locking up the daughters one is probably a blend of the two ideas. The idea of locking up girls to control their wanton ways was pre-Victorian, whereas locking them up to protect them from the lustful advances (read rape) of a specific man was primarily Victorian. i do know a lot of people who say “oh lock up your daughters” when some guy dresses up and makes an effort to look nice, with the implication that women will be throwing themselves at him, which hearkens back to the older narrative, but this shirt clearly means it differently.
Attackfish(Quote) (Reply)
Well of COURSE it’s the womenz fault! Didn’t you know? Everything bad in the world is because of women. Women are why we can’t have nice things!
D:
And, of course, everything GOOD in the world is because of men…it’s just really depressing to see how much of this sort of mentality I get all the time, seriously or flippantly, from everywhere.
The Other Anne(Quote) (Reply)
Yeah…I would be dead and rotting if sex was a need.
Dani(Quote) (Reply)
I was reserving judgment on Assange until he admitted he had “sex” with a woman who was sleeping, what’s the big deal. Even not knowing that though, seriously? What is more important to the cause here?
Shaun(Quote) (Reply)
DAT MADONNA/WHORE COMPLEX
HOW I LOATHE IT.
Casey(Quote) (Reply)
The first civilization I can think of off the top of my head who thought this were the Romans, I think. Since the men would have teenaged brides they naturally assumed ALL WOMEN EVERYWHERE were stupid and horny.[/ageism and misogyny everywhere]
Casey(Quote) (Reply)
The greeks did too, again with the pubescent brides and older men. Hmm.
Attackfish(Quote) (Reply)
except we also lock up our valubles. It can go either way.
Attackfish(Quote) (Reply)
Thanks for correcting that misspelling.
Casey(Quote) (Reply)
Hehe. Loath/loathe never fails to get me twitching. I couldn’t help it.
sbg(Quote) (Reply)
Well, yes. It’s not a hard and fast rule of grammar. But generally, I think lock up means the person/animal is trying to get out.
Sylvia Sybil(Quote) (Reply)
Do you think that phrasing might be left over from the Latin? I think valuable’s root is valoir, which is like… the feminine pluperfect in French?
I… play a lot of Scrabble.
Maria(Quote) (Reply)
I did some research. No hint of the origin of the phrase online, but some interesting cultural trivia:
A Naval trivia page says this letter began being used in 1982 to announce to loved ones a sailor was coming home. It begins:
LOCK UP YOUR DAUGHTERS:-FILL THE FRIDGE WITH BEER:- GET HIS CIVVIES OUT OF MOTHBALLS’
Then it lists several things to be aware of about your sailor:
“For the first few weeks (until he has been house trained) be particularly watchful when he is in the company of women, especially the young and beautiful ones. After seeing women wooed by handsome men on the video screen, he thinks himself the master of the art himself. His intentions will be sincere although dishonourable, but keep in mind that beneath his rugged frostbitten exterior, there lies a heart of gold. ”
The ever-delightful Yahoo!Answers reports:
“It means put them in a safe place because I’m comin’ to tear that pu$$y up!”
And then there’s the musical:
Lock Up Your Daughters is a musical based on an 18th century comedy, Rape Upon Rape… Plot Summary: In London, 1735, naive young Hilaret leaves over-protective walls of her father’s house resolved to elope with her beloved Captain Constant. She charges Ramble with rape, and her maid Cloris charges Constant with rape. The cases are tried by the corrupt justice, Mr. Squeezum.
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
Gross.
JT(Quote) (Reply)
word
Attackfish(Quote) (Reply)
Holy shit, are you kidding me? RAPE UPON RAPE?
Maria(Quote) (Reply)
Ugh, I hate when guys expect women to laugh at every “joke” they make. Or even every joke that some comedian who they think is funny makes. If I have a different sense of humor, that doesn’t make me a bad person. It doesn’t mean I have “no” sense of humor. It means that I do not find certain things funny. Not necessarily even that I find them offensive (though I have known people who tell/make me watch jokes which they know will offend/discomfort me and then get pissed when I don’t laugh–no, I will not magically get over my belief that racism is bad just because someone is making racist jokes with puppets!). Just that different people find different things funny, period. Or they’ll get the idea into their head that I don’t like dirty jokes or don’t like jokes with profanity and show me some “clean” comedy where the comedian is still making offensive comments about “midgets” or women or whatever. No, please–say the word “fuck” as much as you want, just don’t be a dickwad.
Come to think of it, the comedians who I dislike are often the ones most likely to make “lock up your daughter”-esque jokes. Jokes about scaring their teenage daughters’ boyfriends with shotguns, “you’re not dating until you’re thirty” jokes, squeemishness around the very concept of periods…and my ex-boyfriend expected me to laugh at that? When I was eighteen, nineteen, twenty and dating him. Oy, with the cognitive dissonance already!
Genevieve(Quote) (Reply)
I guess in a “propogating the species” sense, we do need sex, sure. At least some people do at some point. But considering that 95% or something of people are using birth control anyway, it’s not like most people have that in mind in their everyday ugly-bumping, or and most people’s sexual fantasies are based oh “damn, zie’s hot,” not “I would love to have a child with this person.” Y’know? So yes, sleep, food, warm clothes, shelter, urination–all that before sex. And it’s really hard to even think about sex if you’re deficient in real necessities.
Genevieve(Quote) (Reply)
Double Word.
SunlessNick(Quote) (Reply)
Doesn’t that title just scream comedy? Fun for the whole family, even! /sarcasm
Sylvia Sybil(Quote) (Reply)
Wasn’t the belief of the day that women needed their wombs to be “moistened” by hot jizz daily or else it would dry up and attack their other organs?
Casey(Quote) (Reply)
I think that anyone who makes that argument is coming from a position of extreme privilege. Anyone who thinks sex is a “need” has probably never been in doubt of being able to attain food, safety, and shelter. Live without those things for a while and suddenly sex doesn’t seem so important.
FM(Quote) (Reply)
Somewhat off topic, but I find it incredibly hard to watch comedians lately. Probably a case of cognitive dissonance, as you’ve said, because their style certainly hasn’t changed very much since I last found them incredibly funny, but now I am mostly disgusted and compelled to switch to anything at the first “women are so complicated, men just want to have sex”-jokes. Though I am pretty sure we think of different comedians, the point still stands.
Elee(Quote) (Reply)
If I NEEDED sex (with another person, mind you, because sex doesn’t always need another person), I would probably be dead for good 10 years. I’m very much alive. But what I really need is meaningful connection with other people, not limited to, but also consisting of physical touch. I need to have someone to hug, to hold hands, to give a backrub and to receive one. It has nothing to do with sex. It is just a way to reassert ones humanity, and I NEED to feel like a human being from time to time.
Elee(Quote) (Reply)
He admitted it? I didn’t know that.
SunlessNick(Quote) (Reply)
It’s hilarious, isn’t it? Oh, those silly gals and their rape charges. I do hope they end up married to their rapists! /sarcasm
Jennifer Kesler(Quote) (Reply)
← Previous Comments
Next Comments →
{ 1 trackback }