What empowerment is

When second wave feminism was happening in the sixties, seventies and early eighties, most people seemed to understand the word “empowerment” by its actual definition: “a multi-dimensional social process that helps people gain control over their own lives.” But then the 90s came, and the definition got muddied. Susan Faludi outlines the process in the intro to the 15th anniversary edition of Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women.

She describes a 90s in which the right wing, panicked that women were becoming empowered, sought to infiltrate third wave feminism and send their own messages. Commercial interests – often the bedfellows of the right wing – followed suit. Suddenly, all sorts of things were feminist! Like “organic” or “lite”, “feminism” and “liberation” had become marketing buzzwords that sold products, but had little meaning. You’ll want to hold onto something when you read this quote from Faludi (p. xiv, preface):

I soon found myself fielding (and declining) multiple invitations from merchandisers to place my feminist seal of approval on brands of blue jeans, high heels, even breast implants.

I sensed things like this happening at the time. When I heard that breast implants and blow jobs were “empowering” women, I knew the word had lost its meaning.

Empowerment vs. feeling powerful

The least empowered person in the world can feel powerful. That’s why it’s so essential to understand the difference. Imagine an African American slave in the 1800s finding little untraceable ways to cause havoc for her master. These acts of revenge may make her feel powerful, and may do her a world of good psychologically. But they don’t change the reality that her master retains complete control over her life, and if he wants to rape her, have a child with her or kill her, he is empowered to do so and she is not empowered to fight back, let alone win.

Why people resist this definition

When I wrote a while ago about how blow jobs were not empowering, I should have anticipated people misunderstanding the concept. But some of the resistance was psychological, not semantic. For many people, feelings of power or “being on top” are the closest they’ve come to actual empowerment, and they very much want to believe they are empowered. I was handing them a harsh reality: “If that’s all you’ve got, then no, you are not empowered.”

I stand by this. But then I don’t think any woman is truly empowered. I think we’ve made progress in that direction, but marketers and the right wing did their best to sidetrack us, and some of it worked. There’s no shame or blame in this. Cultural shifts usually happen like waves: one generation gives its limited and befuddled all (i.e., second wave feminism opened some doors despite its cringe-worthy failure to remember anyone other than educated white middle class ladies), and then the movement falls apart for a period of self-review, and then the next generation gives its limited and befuddled all (i.e., third wave feminism was much more inclusive, but got a little derailed by the stuff I talked about above), and so on.

We have to mark progress by looking at examples like young adults today failing to understand what the big deal about Cagney & Lacey was, because they see women detectives as an ordinary part of reality (at least on TV). So we may not be “empowered” yet, but we are making progress.

But what about individual empowerment?

Since power by definition is about a relationship between multiple entities, I find the idea of being “empowered” within yourself absurd, at least in terms of language. But let’s talk about personal transformations that psychology refers to as “self-actualization.” Self-actualization is a beautiful thing that can occur whether an individual becomes empowered or not. If the slave’s acts of revenge transform her in some positive way, even though they don’t improve her horrible situation, that’s self-actualization. Some people find self-actualization through religion or spirituality or exploration; through the dumping of a religion; through therapy; through personal revelations; through being loved by someone; through loving someone. However you find it, it’s good stuff, even if it doesn’t improve your life.

Empowerment can occur on a personal level – between you and another entity (or entities) in your life – and this is what some people mean when they talk about “personal empowerment.” One example would be an abused child who grows up, moves out and learns how to overcome or at least work around the scars left in her psyche: she no longer needs her abuser, so his power over her is suddenly gone. An actress spends years getting used and abused by the film industry, and then suddenly finds herself with the kind of fan base that will cause big trouble if the industry doesn’t negotiate with her. Or, more simply, a person raised to be shy and meek discovers how to assert herself.

These are all good things, because they can remove or improve bad relationships in your life. This is another reason why I found the notion of empowering blow jobs troubling: who do blow jobs give you power over? One of the cornerstones of feminism is the idea that power should be equal in romantic/marital relationships. I’m pretty sure the women I’ve talked to who claim blow job empowerment are not seeking creepy levels of power over their mates. So this is not a case of empowerment, and it shouldn’t be. It’s a case of feeling powerful, or possibly even becoming self-actualized through sexual exploration or a healthy romantic relationship. Again, that’s all good stuff. It just doesn’t change the fact that your political rights over your own life still pretty much end wherever a bunch of white dudes say it does.

Isn’t this just semantics?

Why is it important that we agree on the terminology? Feeling powerful, being empowered, what’s the diff? The difference lies in understanding that women are still not empowered to prevent the erosion of our reproductive freedoms (which were never fully secured in the first place), our right to education, our entitlement to the same wages men get paid for the same work (still not quite there, and this recession will provide yet another excuse), and so on.

We must bravely face our lack of empowerment, and determine that we will overcome it. Soothing ourselves temporarily with the illusory empowerment of whatever marketers are selling us is just another distraction from the real goal. And those who are truly empowered are taking, and will continue to take, every advantage of our distraction that they can.

Comments

  1. Audra says

    Thank you, this is very informative. I started reading your blog about a year and a half ago and I have slowly gained more and more confidence to speak about the things I already knew and believed, I just didn’t have the words to talk about and explain them. This is one area that always throws me.

  2. says

    I never bought the idea that giving blow jobs was “empowering” in the slightest, but my idea of empowerment was still at the personal level: for example, my mother empowered me to know how to re-wire a fuse, cook nutritious meals, change my own tyres instead of waiting at the side of the road for a man to do it for me — things that give me more control and independence in my own life. Looks like I’ve been thinking too small!

    So — what sort of things are empowering?

  3. Anemone says

    Being able to file a human rights complaint. And win. :) A very good feeling, I must say, though so far I have only succeeded on a disability-related issue, not sexism/sexual harassment. Yet.

    Also, I think publishing documentation (that others can use) that an industry is unnecessarily sexist is actually empowering, even if it feels more frustrating than anything.

  4. says

    Pebblerocker,

    I would count that as “personally empowering” – like the abused child who grows up and processes what happened to her and is able to deprive her abuser of the power he had over her, a woman who has some skills that are supposed to be men’s skills (law degree, ability to change a flat, whatever) reduces her chances of being victimized by a future abuser. It’s sort of pre-emptive, but it’s still empowering.

    That said, what I’m talking about with big social political empowerment would include the things like:

    –Laws that guarantee reproductive freedom
    –Women becoming a big enough demographic in politics that the political parties working to destroy our freedom wouldn’t be able to do so.
    –Rape being taken seriously by law enforcement and the general public
    –Cultural shift where women aren’t “damned if they do/don’t” when it comes to sex. (Preferably, no one should be judged on their sex life.)
    –Cultural shift where the work performed by stay at home partners is recognized, so they get the decent job their life experience qualifies them for after their spouse dumps them instead of slogging at minimum wage and trying to provide for the kids.
    –Cultural shift wherein people (particularly judges) are more aware of how abuse works (for example, that abusers often seem calm and rational while their victims seem distraught because, hello, they are distraught!)
    –Cultural shift wherein people realize that having women be able to take care of themselves is a good thing. (I’m convinced some men think the only reason anyone ever slept with them was out of social coercion, and this fuels their refusal to consider ANYTHING that helps women depend less on the men around them.)
    –Getting boys and men to expect enthusiastic consent rather than a lack of “no”, not only in the bedroom but in life in general.
    –Cultural shift wherein girls are taught it’s okay for them to assert themselves and say no… and they actually don’t get punished for it!
    –An end to coerced sex work (in which the sex worker had no practical choice about taking up that line of work)

    Stuff like that. Also, what Anemone said. What Raeka mentioned, I’m less sure about. That’s great allyhood, but the power remains with the guys in that scenario, right? I would find it more empowering if when I say something, men just fucking listen WITHOUT first polling the room to see if all the other guys are ready to admit I exist.

  5. says

    had 2 chuckle @ that last part—a man actually listening 2 me w/o polling all the other guys in the room—and that’s ferociously annoying when the one doing the polling is your own husband

  6. The Other Anne says

    maggie,

    This reminds me of something my stepdad did to my mother a little while ago. She said she was going to give blood, or it came up somehow, and he made the claim that giving blood is what you call it when a doctor takes a blood sample during a physical or whenever instead of donating blood at a blood drive.

    My mom, by the way, is a nurse and has been actively nursing since she was about 22–about 32 years. My stepdad was a pilot and is now a football coach.

    Instead of actually listening to her, he was so convinced that he was right and the nurse in the room was wrong that he went to facebook and posted a poll. Every single person agreed with my mom’s definition of giving blood, including my stepsister who is working on her neuroscience PhD….and THEN he decided my mom was right. URGH.

    This is a man who carries a concealed weapon because he’s just that paranoid, and WHILE carrying a concealed weapon he says things like “I’ll kill every person on the planet before I lose an argument.”

    Yeah. So, I’d love to even feel like I could disagree with him without having some sort of hesitation that he’d hurt me if he thought he might lose an argument with me. Blah.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>